I've been an investor since 2017, but it's a slow transition. I am not Bitcoin only, and I make equal investments into both Bitcoin and Wall Street, primarily because Bitcoin does not have a revenue stream other than mining.

Everyone is going to bring their own ideas and ideals into this. Some far this way on a spectrum, some far that way. I'm mostly interested in keeping things real and focused on improving people's lives. We don't need things 100% one way or the other, we just need to stay focused on the real goal which is building a civilization that works for everyone.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Read nostr:npub1trr5r2nrpsk6xkjk5a7p6pfcryyt6yzsflwjmz6r7uj7lfkjxxtq78hdpu's Hidden Repression (a short book) which demonstrates that the current system does not work for anyone — especially those who rely on the support of the IMF and World Bank.

I would like to say that I share in your ultimate goal: a civilization that works for everyone. However, I’ve become less sure that it’s possible to achieve. Today, people have VERY difference perspectives on what civilization should look like. This isn’t just an American red vs. blue issue. A global example is Sharia law vs. Western law, which offer very different perspectives on what a ‘good civilization’ means.

You’ll get no resistance from me on holding a diversified portfolio that includes US equities. Row your own boat. It’s up to each investor to determine their own risk tolerances and outlooks. Maxis who demand 100% allocation to Bitcoin for themselves and others are zealots, not investors, and mostly do not yet have enough life experience with regards to liquidity preferences on various time horizons, financial engineering, capital management, or reserve assets, in general. Do what works for you.