This is pie in the sky stuff. Like when olas beta launched and you had people saying nostr was the next instagram.

What slack offers businesses now is utterly incomparable to what any nostr slack clone offers now or can offer in the future. The same is true for say Okta.

It's about nibbling around the edges and solving problems that nostr can actually solve, now today. And not mentioning nostr. And soft forking it. And all this in the context of solutions where nostr's architecture offers some explicit advantage outside of some [music] future vision.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Well I agree to focus on Nostr's points of leverage, and not needing to name Nostr at the time you try to cross the chasm. But, I don't see any reason to pull punches, so if you're not pointing yourself at a $bn+ competitor incumbent then I would say you're aiming small. The benefit of aiming big instead is you're not taking any business model risk, you get to simply copy and incumbent and be a fast follower riding better rails.

Think big never hurts, but when you look at what Okta alone does, for IAM and the rest, a nostr equivalent (if you want to call it that) offers like 1% of that (and maybe with millions in investment in a nostr-based Okta then 5%). Sure with nostr you get bonus things that Okta can't do, but the things you have to give give up are non-starters for business.

The same for slack, nostr is just not an architectural basis for a piece of software that can do what Slack does, and giving up these things that Slack does again is a non-starter. Nostr at best can augment these platforms by filling in certain gaps or serving certain niche demographics.

For a reality check, the closest thing to Slack on nostr is chachi.chat.