Thoughts?

nostr:nevent1qyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg5waehxw309aex2mrp09skymr99ehhyee0qydhwumn8ghj7argv4nx7un9wd6zumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcqypwf78yye6y4v0evxnnk6hsxm4mv5wnqyff39qyaeyw7h2qhvpvkwqnq9ud

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Real-Time Lightning payments embedded in the license file.

I used to manage the Digital Media Studio at Texas Tech University and we had a plethora of licenses that allowed usage of Adobe Suite, Autodesk Suite, etc.

I always thought that instead of paying the monumental fee for a single seat licence of, say Unreal Engine (pro), there could be a streaming payment of sats every time the program sensed mouse movements/button clicks/click and drags/rendering inside the active window of the application.

A "pay per use" if you will. Could be implemented in damn near everything. Problem with this is that it bolsters the "subscription model" of the big company apps. Still, I think there is something there until we replace all this shit with the old "Buy once, pay for upgrades" model.

Not a well thought out idea. Package installs happen often and many times over. Simple solution to the paywall will be cache. If you want to sell a package, make a privately hosted repo and sell it normally. All this micropayment madness is actually tested on every cloud provider, so people optimize for costs and efficiency accordingly 🐶🐾🫡

You’re right. That note took me 2 minutes of thinking to write. There’s a lot of nuance in how you would go about implementing something like this but would a company, for example, pay 10 Sats per install of a module they can’t get anywhere else that’s super useful to their product development and also potentially write off that money as donating to open source? I think yes.

i think it could work if the cost is low enough that it works out to no more than longer term (eg i pay ~$100/y for intelliJ IDE, i just paid for Zorin OS Pro also because they were the only distro that was supporting new AMD video cards, i think i'd be happy to throw at least $150/year at keeping my core systems and tools in shape, hell, i'd pay to see Go maintained if it weren't already making so much money for google

Why if you can cache it? You can already buy packages and many companies do so just by simply buying the licenses to them or getting access to the private registry. Feels like unnecessarily complex solution to the already solved problem. It’s not like companies will have an LN wallet accessible to all the deployment systems and CI/CD pipelines that can be ran anywhere in the world and on any server. Risk with no benefit and high maintenance costs is what I see here 🐶🐾🫡