It seems the whole thing has always been a moving target, and nothing new at all. It's very push n pull. Minor victories in favour of encryption here, minor victories against it over there, and by creating a movement an anti-movement inevitably and automatically emerges. It is a cyber war after all. We're all winning and losing these battles.

It's obvious that banning encryption is futile. I think the real argument is *who's* encryption are they trying to ban and who's right to encrypt is under threat at any given time. It's blatant that they are referring to our cryptographic tools...as in the general public's. Not theirs. Imagine if militaries stopped using encryption, or governments, or intelligence agencies. Actually, don't - No point in doing that because it will never happen. It would be too dangerous - They just mean our encryption...the end user(s).

It's simply another power grab.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Exactly ! and it will be motivated by fear, external threats, security, etc..

Well those will certainly be the excuses. Technosolutionism can't solve the problems that they blame on the public's use of cryptographic tools because said problems are human ones.

Humans will always find a way ! And that’s part of the beauty of open source !

πŸŒπŸŒŽπŸŒπŸ“’ πŸ’œ

love your positivity, amine