I find your position to be intellectually compelling, and I expected nothing less from you based on the few interactions we’ve had.
We find purpose and meaning from very different places, I will acknowledge that. 🤣 But I love it. So much diversity of thought. If I am remembering correctly, Dawkins has a similar line of reasoning re:purpose and meaning, and Dawkins is another intellectual that I disagree with and deeply enjoy reading.
I do believe if there is a definite truth somewhere between our positions, that AI research will be a great testing grounds for finding it! I believe I posted a few months ago that I believed the question of the century would be determinism - and I had AI in mind when I posted it.
If AI truly produces something that is convincingly sentient - conscious - then it would certainly support your stance, and I would have to reconsider mine fundamentally. Unfortunately for my side, I don’t think a failure for AI to do so will be as strong of an evidence for my stance.
I do find it fascinating how we as humans can feel so differently about determinism, which is what I feel this conversation really boils down to in some way.