That line of argument is not uncommon but I disagree. Meaning of life is what we ascribe to it. And if we pick a meaning of life that is at odds with consciousness emerging from rather simple building blocks, we might not have picked well.
I find Darwinism as a general purpose of all living beings quite convincing. We live to adapt to whatever the universe throws at us and if the universe threw the end of the universe at us, maybe that thriving high tech civilizations decided to have lives in the matrix. Maybe we get unplugged at some point to appreciate the approaching black hole and we jump back in to play another life. Maybe you've plaid 100 lives before and decided to play with a mental challenge this time. And maybe the world is a rats maze that we have to find the way out? Once you figure out the purpose of the current simulation, you win and get to play the next level.