My man, the Keynsian’s got you so confused. Let’s play a word association game. Should help you get back to the roots of our language. If you blur the meaning of words, we can’t communicate. Here are my associations:
Money-gold (interestingly, confusingly, serves two purposes. A commodity ie raw material for jewlery, and, separately, money)
Property-land
Commodity-wheat
Investment-open a bakery
Woman-baby
Man-…
You can’t invest money in money
You can’t eat money
You can’t grow things on money
A man can’t have babies
Etc
Yes, a man is also a human, but a man is not a woman. And yes, the first five are also assets („enough to settle a will“). But money is not a commodity, property (any item that a person or a business has legal title over. Property can be tangible items, such as houses, cars, or appliances, or it can refer to intangible items that carry the promise of future worth, such as stock and bond certificates), nor an investment etc etc
Why would you want to classify money that way anyway?