Notes could have their own PRs. Picture this scenario: you write a note, share it, and then one of your friends spots a mistake and submits a patch to rectify the error in your note. You merge it and it replaces the original note.
That's the real social app.
GM.
I was just thinking about this yesterday. Would the modified note show its edit history?
Yep. Edits are fine if you show the history.
I always thought a new "revision" note kind would be great. Others could submit any revisions they'd like, and a note inherits a revision when the author of the original signs. You could also create a find-replace like regex to make the revision notes lighter-weight, but it may also allow interesting functionality like repeating content, expanding shorthand, etc.
But then what will become of our #ForeverTypo culture?
Its pretty affordable if notes are not kind 1, you can get it using kind23
I like this idea—and merging is a choice.
Fuck. This is Genius!
😆
I think this is getting a bit overboard... Let's focus on getting the core functionality working nicely and easily understandable for all end users, then worry about scenarios that are outside the scope of social networking/communication. For example, maybe focusing on an edit functionality by the note creator first, then worry about editing by others.
Nah.. go big or go home. :)
How is that different than just being able to edit you post?
*which would be great btw*
I like this! Maybe more popular accounts would want optional zap-gated edit/PR to prevent spam? Zap could be refunded upon merge? Just spit-balling here.
nostr:note1knyusf89gguh06z3jgpu7spzkgqstjpjqn4d943cdzdmx3t8zg7srsqsj3
