we parse them without nostr:, although we probably shouldn't
If you mean note-links with use of noteID,
you have to add “nostr:” before noteID, that is nostr:
I believe it would be useful if nostr:
What’s the other side of the argument for sticking with the status quo?
nostr:note1efht3sz7jdfrxs7jnek0080sgug580reqykuslxwxev564n0cdnqs4z09y
Discussion
No replies yet.