If you mean note-links with use of noteID,

you have to add “nostr:” before noteID, that is nostr: nostr:npub1hzz35pkl67w53lpj2g62zh56g63j5zvz4q3m2nxlsfg5hxcjpwssaynqel

I believe it would be useful if nostr: was included when copying å noteID, nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg nostr:npub18m76awca3y37hkvuneavuw6pjj4525fw90necxmadrvjg0sdy6qsngq955 nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s

What’s the other side of the argument for sticking with the status quo?

nostr:note1efht3sz7jdfrxs7jnek0080sgug580reqykuslxwxev564n0cdnqs4z09y

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes been using the ID but why to have the link option if it doesn’t work properly

we parse them without nostr:, although we probably shouldn't