Private follows should be a thing.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

πŸ˜‚

For all those dirty little pleasures

110%

Absolutely.

Someone appreciates Gossip's manual-only contacts list push for this reason.

That's also why I loved G+ circles.

While you could see who followed you, you don't know what circles a user put you in.

But I definitely agree on private follows too.🀝

What we made lists for

I remember these from Twitter. I had a bunch of well maintained lists. I kept most public, but can see the desire for private lists too.

I was a heavy user of those! Most my lists were private. The best part was being able to add an account to a list without having to follow it.

Customizable feeds can deliver lists and more. Gossip client might add scriptable feed views…

Private follows and private relay listsπŸ™Œ

βœ…

πŸ’―

Private mutes too πŸ™‚

That would be great. Optionality.

Dual wielding two npubs? One for just following, one for public discourse?

A lists function would be awesome as well. Particularly when implemented as easily clickable or swipeable alternative timelines that also remember timeline position πŸ™

πŸ’― Lists make it easier/possible to focus on one topic at a time. Even better if they remember where you left off

I do not want this right to be given to people who may be cowards or perverts.

If I want to follow someone, I will.

If he is uncomfortable with my following or not, he has the right to block and mute.

Of course I respect it.

What is secret stalking? What nonsense.

Will he follow me secretly like a pervert?

It may not be stupid. In this case, it's cowardly. Stay away from me.

Finally, I'm not stupid enough to fantasize about someone following me.

Because I don't follow people to flirt. I'm interested in the posts.

I am interested in chat.

#[0]

Absolutely.

How about Bell notifications for individual npubs?