Private follows should be a thing.
Discussion
For all those dirty little pleasures
110%
Absolutely.
Someone appreciates Gossip's manual-only contacts list push for this reason.
That's also why I loved G+ circles.
While you could see who followed you, you don't know what circles a user put you in.
But I definitely agree on private follows too.π€
What we made lists for
I remember these from Twitter. I had a bunch of well maintained lists. I kept most public, but can see the desire for private lists too.
I was a heavy user of those! Most my lists were private. The best part was being able to add an account to a list without having to follow it.
Customizable feeds can deliver lists and more. Gossip client might add scriptable feed viewsβ¦
That would be great. Optionality.
Dual wielding two npubs? One for just following, one for public discourse?
A lists function would be awesome as well. Particularly when implemented as easily clickable or swipeable alternative timelines that also remember timeline position π
π― Lists make it easier/possible to focus on one topic at a time. Even better if they remember where you left off
I do not want this right to be given to people who may be cowards or perverts.
If I want to follow someone, I will.
If he is uncomfortable with my following or not, he has the right to block and mute.
Of course I respect it.
What is secret stalking? What nonsense.
Will he follow me secretly like a pervert?
It may not be stupid. In this case, it's cowardly. Stay away from me.
Finally, I'm not stupid enough to fantasize about someone following me.
Because I don't follow people to flirt. I'm interested in the posts.
I am interested in chat.
#[0]
How about Bell notifications for individual npubs?
