This would be in total contradiction with their existing NIMBY attitude towards nuclear power and all of the climate hoax funding for any form of power worse than nuclear and fossil fuels. Do you have a means of explaining why and/or how the establishment would be casting aside their loyal climate cultists and associated NGOs and the like in pursuit of this reversal?

Could it be that we have already had a lot of anti-nuclear power reactor propaganda and that is the reason why we are so far behind a truly green solution to the energy crisis? It seems to me that there is a lot of effort put into demonising it when it is more reliable and dependable than nearly any other form of power generation - almost as if a small number of people at the top don't actually want the majority of the population to have prosperous and pleasant lives... When they used to tell us that it would be "too cheap to meter" and then added so many rules and regulations that it is an expensive way to provide for us now!

For some reason, this reminds me of the time an old friend mentioned she was anti nuclear because she watched a Netflix show about Chernobyl.

All I hope for is a glut of efficient power generation to reduce costs.

Decentralizing the grid would be pretty cool too from a strategic standpoint. If I'm gonna live in a country intent on picking fights, it'd be nice if asymmetric warfare couldn't take down a huge chunk of the country with a few strategic truck bombs and a couple dozen dudes driving around shooting transformers.

I would like a personal small nuclear reactor, for reasons