That all sounds really implausible.
Discussion
supposedly he had a gunshot to the head.. did we see that happen or hear it? desert eagle pretty loud. he also was not identified by dna at the scene because it was unrecoverable.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I always look for the likely, plausible explanation before putting my tinfoil hat on. I don't know enough about the details to argue a particular explanation, but what you're apparently proposing is not something I would entertain unless all other explanations were legitimately ruled out, and all the specific evidence supported it. Explanations like this are packed with innuendo and conjecture masquerading as fact, just like every conspiracy theory. So, I'll be waiting for more information before I jump to conspiritorial conclusions.
there was a nostr note that laid it out really well, but, ill prob never find it again.. oh well. it was good enough for me. nothing else makes that much sense (and media pretends like there is no email despite him being in contact w multiple journalists).
Theories that make sense to some aren't equal to objective evidence that supports every aspect of the situation. The problem with conspiritorial thinking is that it substitutes biased speculation for reason and empiricism, conflating the two as if they were both valid ways of arriving at the correct answer. And often times the conspiracy theorist believes their subjective conjecture is even better than objective facts. It's just not a good way of determining what's actually true.
when surrounded by a world where you cant prove anything or trust anything, your choice is.. to believe nothing.. see thats kinda boring. im not saying hop on every train, but live a little maybe 😂