Replying to Avatar ODELL

OPENSATS FUNDS DEVS BASED ON THEIR PROOF OF WORK ON OPEN SYSTEMS.

WE HAVE PROVIDED OVER 120 GRANTS. NONE OF THEM ARE WORKING ON “SHITCOINS ON BITCOIN.”

IRONICALLY SAYLOR’S OWN IDENTITY PROJECT RELIES ON INSCRIPTIONS.

GRANT RECIPIENTS PROVIDE QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORTS TO THE BOARD. THESE ARE USED TO ASSESS RENEWAL REQUESTS.
Avatar
DRE 1y ago

I wasn’t talking about OpenSats or arguing it doesn’t take measures to ensure their grant recipients are vetted. I was just pointing out that no strings attached is not governed by definition.

Malice is not needed to break things. The path to hell is paved with good intentions after all.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
btconboard #LNHANCE or #CTV 1y ago

If you think it will break things just don’t run their software

Avatar
DRE 1y ago

That’s a meme

People running pre taproot Core are still affected by higher fees resulting from ordinals/runes. You can’t escape all unintended consequences from changes to the code

Avatar
btconboard #LNHANCE or #CTV 1y ago

If you need (in a UASF) something like 80%+ or nose to update, it really doesn’t take many people not updating to stop a fork or at least a chain split

Avatar
btconboard #LNHANCE or #CTV 1y ago

*Of nodes