Women have no place in the Secret Service. They simply aren’t wired for it. 
Discussion
There is no difference whether a man or a woman fails to protect you from a shooter.
There is in that the likelihood is far greater if a female is meant to protect. They're not built for it in exactly the same way a man is not built to nurse children. Sure, some black magic* could technically make it happen, but it's not natural.
*(hormones or feminism, pick your poison)
In this particular case, the woman did the same "nothing" that the men did.
The dumbest take ever. The difference would in recovery. Anyone can let one through, but the difference would be in reaction time and who can drag the body to safety. Women lack the upper body strength to drag a fallen soldier off of the field.
Same for a Secret service agent. I wouldn't go as far to say women have no role, the certainly do. But perhaps not on the president's detail.
It's like saying that women should serve in all places men do in the armed forces. It's just not true. The ability to carry dead weight matters, whether its equipment or other soldiers.
The most fit female Marines still only rank in the lower percentages when compared to their male counterparts. Again, no different for secret service.
Immediate burden.
Nor any security or military. That's a man's job.
💯