Hey thanks for engaging thoughtfullyšš¼. I never got a chance to respond to nostr:nprofile1qqsddtl6r9dmwx22wpvr9af4lfjm4vwcmndd56e9grlnfvmsjygtzacpz4mhxue69uhks6tnwshxummnw3ezumrpdejqz9thwden5te0wahhgtnwdaehgu3wwpshyarertrqe8's last message. Iām quite a busy guy and I can only engage so far in these online discussions before Iām needing to move back into IRL/work/etc (which happens to include being present with my amazing wife š).
I think in order for us to find common ground we should avoid extremes. To me, the version of conditional that you put forth there is an extreme. I agree: the way you put it sounds abusive. So letās think of it as a spectrum from rigidly conditional (unhealthy) to self-destructively unconditional (also unhealthy).
Somewhere between the extreme conditional and unconditional is āhealthy adult boundariesā. You said it yourself: abuse is a hard no. Ok great, thatās a healthy boundary.
IMO thereās lots of room within a set of reasonable healthy adult boundaries to have a deep, spiritual, kind, and forgiving relationship where you lean into one another instead of withdraw when things arenāt perfect. Thatās not rigidly conditional, and itās also not completely unconditional because there are lines both partners know they canāt cross no matter the emotional state.
To bring it full circle, in my opinion, itās deep respect that keeps those boundaries in place as we navigate the beautiful emotional messiness of bonding with a life partner.