Replying to Avatar ₿enjamin

inside the space this is pretty far from cutting edge, what were the most edge things you learned from this?
Avatar
Kendy 5mo ago

+1 on far from cutting edge.

Attia has a very centralized and myopic view on healthcare. Here’s an example: https://x.com/bitcoinand_beef/status/1808136135161287023

cc: nostr:npub1yd2h2lrwchshvm46jq7auh65tjkxmgnapkavh7tjtqq07kknupxsa980tv

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
jb55 5mo ago

those frequencies do not harm humans

Avatar
Kendy 5mo ago

I wish that were the case. I imagine you want to conclude that to justify your chronic exposure.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33917298/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30533171/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24982785/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19811395/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22005645/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15121512/

nostr:npub1vyrx2prp0mne8pczrcvv38ahn5wahsl8hlceeu3f3aqyvmu8zh5s7kfy55

Avatar
jb55 5mo ago

ok? the sun does way more dna damage than any small amounts you might be able to measure from non-ionizing radiation. yet our bodies continue on since it can repair itself. I'm not losing sleep over weakly interacting EM fields.

Avatar
Leigh 5mo ago

Agree.

On EMF: https://www.emfacts.com/the-procrustean-approach/

PDF: https://www.emfacts.com/download/The_Procrustean_Approach.pdf

“This thesis contends that, rather than taking a precautionary approach, Western standard setting organisations have actually followed what can best be described as a Procrustean approach. This approach consists of cutting off from consideration scientific data that does not conform to their bed of knowledge. Such an approach can be considered just as inimical to public health protection as was Procrustes’ mythical bed for the public of his time.”