You mean don’t comment on people’s public social media posts? It’s amazing that you’re defending abuse of the spam reporting function to censor ppl, absolutely unreal.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It’s also extremely dishonest that you’re framing it as “reduce my reach to their followers” when I’m completely censored on the Amethyst app in general.

Whats the problem? You were blocked from some relays?

I was falsely reported by 8 ppl for “spam” for disagreeing with their takes on bitcoin, so now I’m completely censored on the Amethyst app.

I am replying to you in Amethyst. So, you are not censored at all.

I was told by an Amethyst user yesterday that my posts are hidden by default and marked as “inappropriate content”. Is that not correct?

It's probably correct. They are following somebody that marked you as spam. If they don't agree, they can stop following that person to see your content. Up to them.

So let’s say I’m critical of a huge account with many followers and they falsely report me as spam, making my posts hidden to a huge group of ppl and effectively censoring me. That seems like a sane and reasonable system to you?

In that case, people either agree with the account and you should be hidden or they don't agree with the account and can blast on the account to change it. Either way, like a free market, people will sort itself out.

I can already see Vitor here wondering why people that actually care about free speech start trashing Amethyst in a few week's time.