Replying to Avatar BitcoinStu

"most can run a node". Only because no one uses bcash. If they did, no one can run a node without millions of dollars of hardware in a low latency datacenter.

The fees on bitcoin are trivially cheap.

Bitcoin on the base chain will not be a global payments network. That will require L2 and L3 solutions.

I am not contradicting myself at all. I'm telling you that I REQUIRE a network that allows me to run a node on my laptop. Anything else and I am not interested.

So you can continue to use bcash and I will continue to use bitcoin. Good luck.
Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

"any computer can validate bcash" This is simply untrue and I have tested it myself with my own hardware. I don't know what talking points you think I'm "spouting" by my opinions are based on 10 years of study of the protocol. I have had these opinions, as I said, since long before the blocksize debate.

Also worth noting when you say "the original design" it was satoshi in 2010 who created the 1MB block size limit. I know this because I've read the code.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

As I said satoshi added the blocksize limit in 2010. I have not been lied to I have read the code.

If you want to "stick to the original design" you can run original code drop from jan 2010 if you want, but you might want to do something about that inflation bug... it's a doozie.