I've never supported walling kids in and starving them
And I've never supported restricting free speech or echo chambering people to foment violence either
Charlie Kirk's crimes against humanity are not mine
Discussion
If youve ever supported a war you are guilty of the same transgressions
If youve ever supported myriad government policies you are guilty of the same transgression
It is not a death sentence
Incorrect
None of the wars or government policies I've supported are the same as genocide or religious fascism
You probably do but you're just intellectually dishonest.
Vax mandates? Genocidal and massive human rights violation
Ukraine war? One of the bloodiest wars ever
I don't know your positions and don't care but it's very unlikely that you don't hold a position that would put you in the crosshairs the same way Charlie was.
Charlie did not deserve to die and you are deeply misguided for thinking otherwise.
Vaccine mandates are not genocidal or a human rights violation
And I didn't tell Russia to invade Ukraine but I don't think they're doing genocide anyway so WTF would that have to do with this if I did
You equate speech with action. it would be unreasonable for me to argue his words aren't support in some specific case. But what you endorse is vigilante death penalty for your interpretation of words. The logical conclusion is a person who lies to their captor to escape deserves to be shot by a human rights advocate who hears those words and chooses sides for that reason. And yet in this case he spoke out truthfully about authentic opinions that are only unpopular to people who do not remember the world as it was only 20 years ago, for the most part.
It's a lot simpler than that: kill one too many kids kids (even with words) and I stop caring if you get killed
That discredits you to thinking adults.
Debatable whether the ones who consider this discrediting are among the ones who think.
I'll recognize that they are, but so am I
There is no such thing as a thinking adult who believes he killed someone, even with words. That you went there is at best disingenuous. If it's not disingenuous, it's a mental issue.
He did kill people with his words, like many (or perhaps all) other Nazis do too