To say this is to break my thesis that money is thermodynamics and it is not possible to break the laws of thermodynamics.

There will always be humans who work and humans who do not work. If those who do not work are going to receive a universal income, they will be anything but free, and if those who work have to support them, which is obvious because money is a form of accounting for energy and energy cannot be created out of thin air, then those who work will not be free either.

You can turn it around as much as you want, but this is called communism.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpl8hpfzul2qha25p8wd63gm46ufax95lfgnl8h9v84y3zt0k05m7qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvtcqyz5j9n0znq8k5d9vq98j9sl2w6ya2w2rgt9zkcjwdtlg23z8jpfs6dn9kaz

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Meh. Rising tide lifts all boats. He is saying universal high income in contrast to universal basic income. I don't think he means income.

In the same way that the poorest people in america today have a higher standard of living than the kings of 1000years ago, he's saying that principle applies on the future. Probably in the future, poor people will have robots bc the rich will buy robots, they will break or become obsolete, and those less rich than them will figure out how to repair them or upgrade them or even just aquire them at a steep enough discount to hire them out for a discount to make their lives better. You can imagine a poor person who figured out how to get 5 broken down robots for the price of 1, strip them for parts to build 2 and then they are making money.

Thata not communism.

Bird said he was abusive to woman

Love your stuff! Do you have any posts about your thesis that money is thermodynamics? Would love to read more about that super interesting.