Because they think nobody would be interested in a controversy, if computers didn't tell them to be, because humans aren't interested in other humans.

We would just spend all day sending each other good vibes and reminding each other to stack sats. If we could be bothered to show up, which we can't, because it's so dull that we go check out what's on X.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think people create disagreements, not algos. People argue on nostr all the time

Yeah, 😂

People argue IRL, too. Makes me wonder, if these complainers are complete hermits or what. 🤷‍♀️

lot of conflict-averse people out there, posing as evolved, when really they’re just fearful of being challenged

Yeah, I'm totally here for the challenge. 😁

I'm that chick in the algorithm design class, frantically waiving my hand to explain to the computer science professor that the program snippet on his slide actually has the loop turning the wrong way.

So they complain about not being able to argue and then proceed to go on ax to be able to argue? 🙄

*on twitter not ax

Social media is entertaining and a great start but I don’t think that’s the main use case for #nostr. Right now, #nostr like going to a meet-up where after a couple of hours you say to yourself ‘Ok, I’ve had enough.’ But you keep coming back because there are really good nuggets, and the price of these nuggets is regularly attending the meet-ups.

Nostr is slowly beginning to turn social media around.

Instead of there being socializing with occasional links to media or topics, there will be media/topics with socializing about and around them.