1: Semtech owns it; there are other chip producers with licenses from Semtech

2: the phy has been reverse engineered and opensourced

3: LoRaWAN is open btw

4: everytime it comes up i have communicated using LoRa is not a good idea; it was designed for a different purpose all together (i.e. large sensor networks for which it is great).

I think the reason people keep going for LoRa is because there are a lot of cheap and easy resources available🤷‍♂️

(Was an IoT consultant, mostly LoRa, for 4,5 years, doing designing and producing sensors all the way to designing and deploying large scale networks)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> Semtech owns it;

I think they only own the hardware design, I think another company holds the patent?

> the phy has been reverse engineered and opensourced

The protocol is patented so I wonder if it infringes and could be sued? I ran into some issues reverse engineering propriety firmware in a past gig.

> everytime it comes up i have communicated using LoRa is not a good idea; it was designed for a different purpose all together

That's the entire point of this note!!!

I would agree, Semtech radios are everywhere, cheap, and easy to talk to, although with the rf95 I ran into some issues where a couple register numbers were swapped but the rf69 docs were correct. I sent them an email but never heard back lol

Semtech acquired the company of the three guys that created the phy, they run the entire thing.

They were hard enough to get a hold off

eventhough we had close ties and direct lines of contact hehe.