"once the receiver goes to spend they're now affected by the sender anonymity side of things"

But that just means that you can see that this wallet sent "something". Correct?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Something like:

[sender = 1 of these 16] sent [amount = ?] to [ receiver = ?]

Amount and receivers are zero-knowledge.

Senders are zero-knowledge within their ring (one of 16, which is why it's the weakest part, but you don't know which one is the real spender).

Does that make sense?

I recently heard someone on monerotopia say that if you're using a public node, you should assume that they have all of your transaction info. That was in relation to some recent privacy concerning news item. Is that not accurate? Even a public node doesn't know who I'm sending to and how much?

No, that's not completely accurate. A public node can't see all your transaction info. But it is true that a public node has *more* pieces of info than if you used your own node of course

What remote nodes CAN see: IP address, last block synced, potentially reduce sender privacy by feeding you manipulated decoys

You can mitigate/eliminate the things above by using a VPN/Tor, switching remote nodes periodically, and if your transaction fails (potential sign of decoy manipulation) switch to a different node as a precaution and try again

>"Even a public node doesn't know who I'm sending to and how much?"

Correct

What remote nodes CANNOT see: amounts, addresses(receivers), your previous transaction histories, wallet balance

But best practice for the best possible privacy is to use your own node

https://localmonero.co/knowledge/remote-nodes-privacy?language=en

Yes, you can see someone in a ring *might* have sent something (you don't know for sure because it could just be a decoy).

But you also have no idea how much or to whom it was sent.

OK, so that's not really much of an issue.