Nostr Web Client

Who’s talking about forcing anyone.

Not sure where that talking point comes from but seems people love copying and pasting it

*I* want to be able to see things my “friends” don’t know exist — and even what they think I should never see.

A technology that has me choose between endless spam or ceding the power to someone else to censor what I see — it’s just more of the same.

There’s nothing new, and certainly nothing censorship resistant about such a system.

Why do *you* want to force me to rely on TTPs for preventing spam when trustless alternatives exist?

You can do whatever you want.

I was only posting about their PoW limiting plan being a bad idea because it won't end up working how they expect.

Please Login to reply.

I’m just pointing the absurdity of implying I want to force people to see my content.

If that’s what not wanting to delegate spam-blocking means, then your stance means forcing people to be censored.

You see how absurd that is.

If you want to choose your censors be my guest — but choosing to do things differently doesn’t mean forcing anyone to see anything.

There’s absolutely nobody trying to force anyone to do anything or see any content.

Yet people keep repeating “censorship resistance doesn’t mean forcing others to see your content” as it meant anything.

Where did that nonsense come from?