GM
I think Adam is feeling the pressure.
In one sense, he is technically correct. Cryptographic signing of Bitcoin transactions is not "encrypting", but encryption is part of cryptography, of which signing is also a function.

GM
I think Adam is feeling the pressure.
In one sense, he is technically correct. Cryptographic signing of Bitcoin transactions is not "encrypting", but encryption is part of cryptography, of which signing is also a function.

Gen, how do you think signals will change?
As usual, FUD always has some truth in it, but that truth is distorted such that it looses rationality.
I discussed my view on the threat Quantum computers may play in the future here:
Thanks π salute π«‘
GM Mike. I can't comment on the comment on the comment. Still recovering from the starlink incident. Head trauma.