🌙Good night 🌙 🧡💜
Any recommendation from #AynRand ? #Nostr #asknostr #bitcoin 
🌙Good night 🌙 🧡💜
Any recommendation from #AynRand ? #Nostr #asknostr #bitcoin 
Atlas Shrugged for sure, Fountainhead also. Anthem for a short read. 👍
Yes. Atlas shrugged is her magnum opus. Anthem is an adorable introduction
The 61 hour Atlas Shrugged audiobook for sure.
Atlas Shrugged. I liked it, but it was a long read.
I loved the fountainhead. The virtue of selfishness is boring as fuck.
There only Atlas Shrugged.
For me Fountainhead was unreadable. Even AS was poorly written, but the guiding principles of individual freedom made the book fascinating.
How far did you get in fountainhead? Idk why a lot of people didn’t like it. I thought it was great haha it really convinced me that living for others is cancerous.
Anthem is short and very good — perfect place to start.
Atlas Shrugged is her magnum opus — it’s awesome, but looong.
We The Living is not about politics or economics (if you don’t like that), but it’s still heavily anti-communist (which is always a plus).
Virtue of Selfishness is a good read if you want an introduction to Objectivism (non-fiction).
I'd suggest Atlas Shrugged, but we're living in the movie, that might ruin the book for you. 🤣🤣
🧡💜
I am close to finishing Atlas Shrugged myself. Highly recommend, very thought-provoking storyline however her writing style can be a little frustrating.
🧡💜
Fountainhead
Over the years I have read most of her books. This is one I keep picking up and reading again and again.
Objectivism is a philosophical system named and developed by Russian-American writer and philosopher Ayn Rand. She described it as "the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute".
Rand first expressed Objectivism in her fiction, most notably The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957), and later in non-fiction essays and books. Leonard Peikoff, a professional philosopher and Rand's designated intellectual heir,[3][4] later gave it a more formal structure. Peikoff characterizes Objectivism as a "closed system" insofar as its "fundamental principles" were set out by Rand and are not subject to change. However, he stated that "new implications, applications and integrations can always be discovered".
Objectivism's main tenets are that reality exists independently of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception (see direct and indirect realism), that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness (see rational egoism), that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism, and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally.
Academic philosophers have generally paid little attention to or dismissed Rand's philosophy, although a smaller number of academics do support it. Nonetheless, Objectivism has been a persistent influence among right-libertarians and American conservatives.The Objectivist movement, which Rand founded, attempts to spread her ideas to the public and in academic settings.
All of them! 🤷♂️
Read rather Hans hoppe or Kant. Their epistemological analysis is way beyond ayn rand. Or is suggest to read both and decide for yourself...
Tell me more
Kant was a rationalist and believed in a priori knowledge. Rand critized Kant for that. But I think most interestingly mises resolved the eternal conflict of can we know something about reality at all but setting up humans as "acting" entities:
"We must recognize that such necessary truths are not just categories of mind, but that our mind is one of acting persons. Our mental categories have to be understood as grounded in action." Hoppe
The the real insight from hoppe is that mises analysis is important not only for economy, but also epistemology