If someone who publicly holds the positions that internet privacy is bad, US citizens don't deserve a lawyer when accused of terrorism, the NSA surveilling all communications is a good thing, and that free speech should be limited – all of which are issues directly touching on your financial privacy – endorses a candidate as a "home run" for secretary of treasury, does that signal to you that this a candidate that would be favorable to protect your constitutional rights? Or would this rather signal to you that this is an individual that may share said positions?