Replying to Avatar karl Black

In five years Saylor and the loudest mouthpieces at Bitcoin Magazine will be leading the charge to increase block size. They’ll say it’s needed to accommodate all the great new things (spam) they’ve put on chain.

They’ll reduce the decentralization by making impractical for plebs to run a node.

They’ll claim it’s for the better for #bitcoin when what they really care about it ROI.
Avatar
TKay 1y ago

Looks like it. But 5 years from now storage will be even cheaper.

At what $ per tb you think increasing the size is ok? We are roughly at $70 per 1TB SSD now I think.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Luke 1y ago

You must me new around here.

Any talk about a blocksize Increase is full-on insurrectionist talk.

We're more likely to make it smaller, but hopefully there are no more changes.

Avatar
TKay 1y ago

I like to have logical arguments. If the fear is risk of decentralization. And the limiting factor is storage price. Then cheaper storage negates to issue.

If you have other considerations, please do share.

Avatar
ShiShi21m 1y ago

We're talking less than a dollar per TB