Discussion
Melania should go to the daddy sex podcast Kamala went to.
Election winner if he can do a good job out of it.
I wonder if Joe is gonna be startled by his handshake again
Joe should suplex him if he tries it đ
The American voter deserves to know Trumpâs positions on DMT, UFOs, and elk meat.
Yes! đđđ
*Deep state scrambling to find a mentally ill patsy in Austin to make attempt #3*
Do you really believe the deep state is after Trump?
More likely than not. https://x.com/oversightpr/status/1815446054428352591?s=46&t=BOWuMIIwHUzD9558SlQV9w
Physics doesnât lie, the event was staged. Once, you understand this it becomes a lot more difficult to explain that the deep state is after #Trump. nostr:note15ysqul98jlkq5kvr6kw7wu3rwzm0sgplhssvtna6sf70q6vlms0qvmy2ya
What about the possibility of only Doug Mills photo being doctored?
IMO, itâs pretty certain that the photo was tampered with. I have also high confidence that the supersonic shockwaves were also simulated to the microphone or added to the live audio feed. Doug Millsâ photo was a key piece of evidence to support the narrative that a bullet grazed #Trump ear. It was released shortly after the shooting. Doug Mills is also a mockingbird (= deep state) journalist. How do you explain why and how he would have faked the photo if it wasnât pre-planned? Why would the deep state released a fake photo of a bullet flying by Trump if the goal was simply to assassinate him. Thatâs just because the goal wasnât to kill him but to create the illusion that they attempted to kill him and failed. Trump is the controlled-opposition candidate. Look they are going after him with frivolous lawsuit, they censor him on Google and they even tried to kill him! People get angry and end up supporting him because the other side is horrible and Trump is perceived as a victim.
I cannot explain how photos are edited with virtually zero technical experience.
I can propose a ~why~ as it would be huge for his photojournalism career.
My previous point is that a fake photo plus authentic audio does not disqualify the possibility of the deep state using Crooks as a patsy.
From my limited knowledge, Iâve observed most deep state operatives are on the liberal side currently.
I understand your reasoning but I think youâre missing the point that Doug Mills isnât any journalist. Heâs a deep state journalist who had direct access to most recent Presidents (Obama, Bush). For instance, heâs the photographer of the Bushâs picture in the classroom the day of 9/11. His presence at a random #Trump rally is already suspicious. Even most folks who think the staged assassination was a real assassination attempt by the deep state are pointing out at how odd it is that Doug Mills was at this rally and waiting to take a picture with a camera setting that doesnât make sense for a political rally. Now, if you add to this, the evidence that the photo was falsified then the only logical conclusion you can come up with is that it was faked to mislead the public on the nature of the event. Deep stateâs operatives are indeed not trying to hide their presence from the democrats side but they certainly want to conceal it from the #Trump side to entertain the narrative that heâs the opposition to the deep state and mislead people so deep state assets remain in position of power. What you say about Crooks is probably true (although itâs not even clear if the patsy was actually Crooks or Yearick) but this doesnât contradict the narrative of a #StagedAssassination .
Why are you certain the photo was doctored?
Have you read this note?
nostr:note15ysqul98jlkq5kvr6kw7wu3rwzm0sgplhssvtna6sf70q6vlms0qvmy2ya
I did yesterday. I had trouble following until i re-read a few times just now.
To confirm, are you implying Doug or his team added the bullet visual too early if it was to match up with the audio?
The delay between the frame at which the bullet is seen in Doug Millsâ photo and when the second supersonic shockwave can be heard cannot be explained by natural occurrence hence the conclusion is that either the photo, the sound or both elements have been falsified. Based on #Trump hand position, the delay is 167 ms while the sound of the sound wave reaches the microphone in 3 ms. No delay between Trumpâs lips movement and the his voice can be perceived but even if we add a minimum perceptible delay (50-100 ms), it still doesnât add up to 167 ms.
So the question is how can you explain this delay other than by concluding that the photo or the sound have been falsified? Nobody has brought up an alternative explanation so far.
my question is why a faked photo means the assassination attempt was staged.
One way to answer this question is to ask why would a mockingbird media photographer would fake a photo that became a key piece of evidence to show the World that #Trump just got shot at?
I dunno man.
I don't think a photo is necessary for proof from their perspective. Having a suspicious guy there to provide supposed corroboration probably just undermines their story in the end, just like you're saying.
So why would they even bother?
Either way, a photo doesn't confirm or deny a thing.
But I agree that it's sus. I just don't particularly care one way or the other.
I mean this photo was a major element to support the mockingbird narrative. Maybe it doesnât matter from your perspective but it definitely mattered from theirs. They knew many people will be inclined to suspect a false flag. Tell people that the #Trump assassination was staged and see what theyâll respond. 80% will refer to the Doug Mills photo to support that it wasnât staged.
Also, in the early days after the shooting, the staged hypothesis was being refuted by saying that it would have been too dangerous of a stunt for the shooter to try to aim at #Trump ear. I donât recall anybody floating the idea that maybe the stunt wasnât so risky because nobody had shot at him. You see, like many people I had seen the photo even before seeing the video. Everybody has seen this photo and from this point on, itâs hard to imagine that Trump wasnât shot at. I myself didnât doubt in the first days that the he had been shot at, then I started being more skeptical by thinking that maybe this photo had been tampered with until it could be proven. So I disagree that this photo didnât play a major role in making the mockingbird narrative credible. For me, if this photo wasnât fake I couldât confidently claim that it was a stunt because it would been indeed too risky.
Also keep in mind that the two only evidence we have that shots were fired at #Trump are the photo of the bullet and the sound of the supersonic shockwave. There is no other evidence that shots were fired at him.
wtf, what about the guy who died and others injured from bullets? đ¤¨
Do you think the deeps state care about a few collateral casualities?
Wrong question.
The people with bullet wounds behind him are proof he was shot at đ¤¨
How is it proof that shots were fired at #Trump? Itâs proof that shots were fired but not at Trump.
Define âat Trumpâ with distance units.
Do you think Crooks was instructed to fire near him? Do you think there was a 2nd or more shooters?
I mean according to the mockingbird narrative, a bullet grazed #Trump ear. What Iâm saying is that we have no proof (besides the photo and supersonic shockwaves which as discussed are falsified) that any bullet was shot in Trumpâs direction. I donât know if Crooks fired any shot but I suspect he didnât. He certainly was instructed of being here and probably to shot at Trump but as a patsy, he just ended up being shot to support the mockingbird narrative. Indeed, it means there were other shooters that shot at the crowd. How many? I donât know. Itâs irrelevant to my observations and conclusion anyway.
Corey Comperatore was KILLED BY A BULLET that aligns with a trajectory from Crooksâ rooftop and right next to Trump. A straight line with 3 points. That is the proof that at least 1 bullet was shot in Trumpâs direction.
The fact that the those shot in the crowd aligned with the line of sight of Crooks with Trump doesnât prove that the shots came from Crooks. The bullets could have come from shooters who had a line of sight to the victims. We donât have any ballistic reports proving where the bullets came from and in which direction they aimed at.
And we probably will never have those reports, unfortunately.
Fair points. Iâve seen some info about a potential shooter on top of the water tower.
Right, thatâs why I always come back to whatâs is provable and indisputable which is the delay between the bullet and the sound that canât be explained other than by falsification of the evidences.
Letâs say the Doug Mills photo and/or the audio was fabricated. Neither of those comprehensively disqualify that a shooter was aiming for a Trump headshot.
True, but try to conciliate these hypothesizes in a coherent narrative⌠Who faked the evidences and why?
I could propose a bunch of theories.
Your conservative side deep state theory is definitely plausible. I find a liberal deep state architecture more compelling personally.
The thing is that if the deep state doesnât play both sides it doesnât do its job. Do you think they are going to let it to the voters to decide whether or not they keep the reigns of power? Also, itâs not the first time #Trump is getting caught participating in a ds psyop. Qanon was exactly this and Trump participated in it via the Qproofs.
Where did the blood come from? If he staged it then he knowingly had people killed to make it look real?
It could easily be fake blood. But yes, a staged event means Trump is in the know. I donât think itâs #Trump and his campaign team who would have put it together alone. Itâs a larger deep state psyop. The narrative that the ds is after Trump is just ds propaganda.
That assumes Iran or another nations state wasnât behind an actual attempt on his life. We donât know who crooks was working with unfortunately
Let me know if you disagree with the observations reported in the note or have an alternative interpretation.
Election is already ongoing with early ballots, better get on it.
That will be interesting to watch đ
Rogan should just boycott Trump who insulted him after he voiced his support for RFKjr. It would be entraining though but only Rogan really challenges Trump.