What? Isn't like 90% of hash rate done by few pools which probably have each other in peer list on their nodes?
Or are you talking about sb randomly miming block on bitaxe?
I doubt they care about single digit % increase in chance of mining valid block.
Exactly. Slower block propagation cements mining centralization by incentivizing the largest miners to create their privileged peer network.
I don't know if they have each other as peers. I do know that at least two pools have complained that ignoring the subsat tx filters caused them to lose money via an increased orphan rate. CKPool complained about this here: https://x.com/ckpooldev/status/1957235824451559746 and Mara Pool complained about it here: https://x.com/PortlandHODL/status/1958520763083825640
So if they *are* peering with one another it is apparently insufficient. The miners who *ignore* that peering (maybe Ocean?) and just broadcast blocks to the rest of the network benefitted by getting their blocks propagated faster, and winning more races. I want to see that play out again, but this time with inscriptions, and to that end I am excited to see the Knots count rise.
Wow, I get it! But the difference has to be miniscule.
The thing is, additional revenue from sub sat txs is 0.06% which is super low. So that's why.
Also the orpahend block chance increases only because some miners are accepting them and some not.
This does not really apply to OP_RETURN debate. Or? Is there sb else beside Ocean?
What is a chance currently, that there are 2 new competing blocks - one by core and one by knots mimer AND next block by knots miner building on the competing knots block?
That's not what your linked posts are complaining about. Both pools have an orphan rate of zero. In fact all pools mining sub sat txs have an orphan rate of zero https://x.com/mononautical/status/1968138304265900433
Wete they complaining about greater *risk* of orphan blocks rather than an increased *rate* of orphan blocks?
The risk is purely hypothetical. However both pools made *more* money by mining sub sat txs. They certainly didn't *lose* money.
It seems strange to stop doing a profitable thing because of unfounded fear. Do you find their behavior strange?
That's the thing: it is NOT profitable as according to ckpool it increased rewards by 0.06% which is nothing.
