I’m familiar, live around lots of farms with farm dogs and farm animals.

Don’t conflate all of the many uses of dogs with the choice few violent breeds out there. I haven’t heard any argument as to why regulation of violent breeds is a bad thing. There’s zero downside to it. I recognize it’s impossible to get rid of the breeds entirely.

I just don’t understand how anyone can go get a dog that has the potential to kill someone in certain scenarios on its own without any coercion or guidance, yet I need a license to drive a car or to carry a gun, a protected 2A activity. Doesn’t make sense

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The last sentence finally makes sense. None of those should be regulated.

Serious question, would you say no regulation for any pets?

Or in general no government/state regulation on anything? Where do you personally draw the line?

At the individual. But that's fantasy but it's called having principles. A guiding direction.

Practically, i'd be happy if US States get more powerful individually so we Balkanize the US.

Bitcoin will continue to push us into anarchy because it IS anarchy manifested. Balkanizing will come before anarchy.

I had a neighbor who was mauled to death by a group of 6 shi-tzus. Should that be considered a dangerous breed then?

Doesn't fit the bias. Only scary looking dogs.

Do you feel compelled to be civil and act right because some law was written by some man? Or you act right because you love Jesus and were raised well?

“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us—for it is written” Galatian3:13

Define 'pets'

How about being responsible for any animal in your charge and dealing with the consequences of their actions. I’ll call my product Tiger Bonds. Insurance for the incredibly irresponsible but also do what you want.