It’s not that you said the photo has to be perfect, but you insinuated it, and potentially insulted Ally by not only going on and on about what she should change in her photo, that she clearly likes and decided to share, but you told her it has “potential”, and you went so far as to re-edit her photos to make them good in your eye. Which means what Ally photographed wasn’t good enough for you, but your edit was better and worth posting. Which is literally the definition of subjective. Art is absolutely subjective. Some people like Mozart, some like Tool. Some like Monet others like Andy Warhol. Doesn’t mean one is good the other is bad they are just different. Before you go on hurling insults by telling me or anyone else to go google image crappy snaps to look at as art maybe have a conversation first. Yes, I understand principles of photography, and I’ve studied photography for years.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Well, that was not my intent to insinuate the photo had to be perfect, as I explained. I was fascinated by the pattern of the leaf. Which I tried to explain with the different examples.

I insult you because you are a third party shit talker who made the wrong assumption about my "intent" making the situation worse. You don't have to worry about me, I am here for the photography and not your penis buttered sandwiches.

One thing I think we all agree upon is that you need to zap all her posts double because I am out. There is no solution where all my thoughts are assumed for me. So goodbye Casey.