It's probably case by case. Immich is Agpl-3.0 which is FOSS license.
But also Immich had this license before joining ways with FUTO…
FUTO apps aren't open source but rather source available with heavy restrictions on usage:
https://github.com/futo-org/android-keyboard/blob/master/LICENSE.md
They're taking the place of real open source apps and making it less likely for viable options to emerge since people are going to use and contribute to these.
Discussion
nostr:npub193pcsgj0mn2s7f898j4eh2j2kczlpplg93zcwq6swf5s7venzz5sgmm5gn It's not possible to change from a pre-existing copyleft license without permission from every contributor or somehow removing all their code and all code based on it which is not practical since who knows what got based on it elsewhere. AGPL also prevents them introducing code under their own heavily restricted non-commercial usage license. They could theoretically pay the contributors and relicense the code though.
I agree, but that is reason why i wrote about it.
Under FUTO are some good FOSS apps and some which are not FOSS.