nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn nostr:npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49 wen communities πŸ‘€πŸ«‚

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Communities are on my list, not sure though if I'm on board with nip 172, it would be nice to make them private optionally

I’d love for whatever we post within the community remain private and not be a kind1

We can make another kind 1 for communities. But they will never be "private". The communities nip is not for private communities.

You already know my thoughts on new kinds vs wrapping for communities. I still think that wrapping is a much better approach, applicable to both with slight differences.

Has anybody implemented wrapping for any event kind?

No, I plan to give it a try, but bogged down in a big refactor right now

Btw, which client did you use to reply? It marked the approval post as the root of the thread, which is not correct.

Coracle, but the parent of my comment is the one with the incorrect root tag.

I believe nevent1qqsql2n2jn8r62sqdtcfgvyk80g7klk58l7nh79jhm5s6uj8mykrfucprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ez6am0wfkxgtngxdazu6nsj7fpkl is the culprit here

Yeah makes sense, without a private option they're more like hashtags