Yes, Racism is a jewish communist word used by the Bolsheviks to control people so it is stupid.
Protecting your country from Illegals and not wanting mass immigration is not racist. Pointing out that blacks are 14% of the population and commit over 50% of the crime is not racist. Not wanting to live in black neighborhoods is not racist, it's survival.
You yourself have proven me right: 50% of crimes are committed by black people, because of that, including the other 50% who don't commit crimes as criminals isn't very accurate... justifying it by probability is even worse... on the other hand, as ANCAP, I respect that you don't want to live with people of color, it's your life choice
The disaster on the US border doesn't justify xenophobia
The remaining 50% probably did not get caught yet.
It's not about not wanting to live with non-people of color just because of their color. History and America proved that diversity does not work. Black people are open about not wanting white people around them. And other races too. somehow this is ok.....Mass immigration is drastically replacing the native people in America, whites. How is this ok? Empires fell throughout history as the original race was replace by immigration over time. How is immigration/diversity good?
Justifying myself with probabilities is worse… the other 50% cannot be proven to have committed a crime… whites and blacks have become radicalized by the different benefits that the state grants to different social groups, roughly speaking… in the same way, saying that ALL brown people do not want to live with whites and vice versa is nonsense… diversity is good in two simple examples: it is much nicer to eat a good sushi made by a Japanese person who lives in the United States than to have a Western citizen try to make it… with its occasional exceptions like everything else… on the other hand, it is good because if a Taiwanese is very intelligent and makes good microprocessors better than the rest and is a good citizen, why would I not want him in my community???… why would he displace the natives from my community or country??? please… I'm not going to tell you that I'm going to accept criminals either
Yeah, there are some benefits to extremely limited diversity but it's been abused to replace whites
You are understanding me… I am not justifying you accepting criminals from other places just because they are oppressed or some other banal justification… I am telling you that CONTROLLED and SELECTIVE immigration, preferably by your community, social group is a super boost for any community… everyone wants the best… with people of color it is something similar
> including the other 50% who don't commit crimes as criminals isn't very accurate
50% of Blacks don't commit crimes. Approximately 23% of Blacks will be convicted of a felony in their lifetime (33% if only Black men are looked at). Most criminals commit more than one crime and at the extreme right tail are a small percentage (1-2%) of the population that commit almost all of the total crime.
Disparities between race should still inform decision making. Black females are more likely to commit homicide over their lifetime than either White or Asian males, despite the usual trend towards men being the more homicidal sex within race. Blacks & Hispanics are also more likely to attack other groups than their own.
You keep talking about probabilities... seriously they label someone something by probabilities and not by their individual actions ???
If you want to justify it out of prejudice or because of your own moral issue… it is your decision and it is respected
That thinking is how strong nations fail.
They will slowly deteriorate and die.
How many times does it have to happen before we learn
Things are getting out of control for the state as they try to be more intrusive… it is multifactorial, added to the clear inefficiency of the state as a regulatory means
This thinking seems similar to suggesting that liking seatbelts because they make you feel more snug is a better reason to use them than their statistical likelihood of reducing your risk of death in a car crash.
It's a fallacy of false analogy to compare belts and humans ignoring that the latter are biopsychosocial beings... but there will be those who will buy that answer and it will be respected
I was merely producing a hypothetical comparison of a human opinion. The entities weren't particularly important. Essentially you believe it is ok for me to be prejudiced as long as it's irrational. I guess then you get to look down on me.
It is VERY important the entities, analyze it later in other days with more calm… I never said what you say
I always said that against these circumstances I can do nothing more… I cannot force you to believe the same as me… that I give up does not mean that I support it
The seems similar to suggesting that liking seatbelts because they make you feel more snug is a better reason to use them than their statistical likelihood of reducing your risk of death in a car crash.
Your first post ended with "change my mind" implying you were inviting discussion.
When I provided evidence that other population groups are engaging in elevated interracial violence you suggested that using probability wasn't individualistic enough but if I am simply prejudiced then that is to be respected.
The entities weren't important to my argument.
Me rn (right now):
What os the income level ofnthe black people. Maybe is not the color of the skin but the necesity to survive what drives people to commot crimes.
Do you seriosly think that there is a genetic difference that makes black people to commit more crimes?
You will not live in a neighbourhood of black, doctors, lawyers or any other high income proffesions because you thinknit will be unsafe?
The problem is in generalizing and not analyzing individually… and here is the moral greatness of libertarianism
Be sure to analyze each and every tiger or black bear out in the wild next time, rather than assuming your life is in serious danger. See how long that lasts.
People generalize because generally generalizations work. Sometimes they don't, like with everything in life.
It's also very contextual and experience teaches you when generalization is a good fit or not.
Have you thought that your argument is self-contradictory, as you generalize a priori that generalizations don't work?
😉 just sayin'.
Merry Christmas!
You are making me a fallacy of false equivalence like another one I mentioned... you ignore that humans are biopsychosocial beings and are different from any other entity because of this… on the other hand, you don't have to analyze all the bears in the forest, just the ones that interest you according your necessities to make the best choice
Anyway, either you get it or you don't 😀 I follow you for the memes, let's leave it at that.
Human beings are biopsychosocial beings… belts, black bears, sharks, etc. are not… it's a fallacy of false equivalence
We leave it here because everything has already been said and we are already repeating
