Do you think people should roll their own "lightning service" or is it enough to just hold their own keys but use some LSP? Because I see a growing trend of non-custodial lightning wallets with a LSP built-in and I'm not sure what to think about it. It's a reasonably good hybrid model, I guess? For people who absolutely cannot run their own node.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Afaict, the LSP for those wallets still holds the lightning keys, even if the on-chain coins are still non custodial. So the lightning funds are still custodial. I'm not sure which wallet you're talking about though. I'd love to be proven wrong.

Yeah, in a perfect world everyone would run their own node with their own keys, but I don't think that world will ever exist. Most people can't even manage a WiFi router. And... I honestly love Lightning. I'm not a hater. Just skeptical.

Perhaps I'm naive, but I'd still like to see some scaling solutions come to Bitcoin protocol. To become money, Bitcoin needs to scale, but every way I look at lightning, I see a new banking system. And I hate banks.

I'm referring to the Breez SDK. I've got the impression that the gist of it is to offer easy-to-setup LSP to wallet creators and the keys can actually be held by the users. Guy Swann did a read on it not long ago on Bitcoin Audible. My knowledge is limited to that pod on the topic but it seemed like a solution to this problem.

Oh really? Thats encouraging! Time to go educate myself a bit on how Breez does this. Thanks for sharing.

I love open source:

https://github.com/breez/breezmobile