JP actually makes a great point here.

nostr:nevent1qqsqns2l49kxqacz44qr9pzhk7rdlsgg9cmvmya3adh2jfursu8nplqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgs8ydw9g5fv9zgc5nwtp4r65jrsnlh0t397gh5974njehz2nge2sugrqsqqqqqpktrts7

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That whole room was gay

Gay is an understatement here. Ubergay 9000.

Ubergay 69,000 to care about people's religious beliefs instead of just asking them something specific about their core values.

Absolutely. Unless... unless you promote yourself as Catholic of the Year all day everyday. Kid did a decent job trolling of the old fart.

All I saw was a few rounds of tit for tat that allows for mistakes, until the defects turned into a vicious cycle zeroing out the balance of given to the 'smart ass'.

The defects were caused by straw man strategies by the smart ass.

JP used a defensive strategy of requesting intent on his turn while the 'smart ass' strategy was either to cooperate with the intent request or 'straw man'.

JP also used intuition to work out that given the straw man remark defects provided by 'smart ass', provided an opportunity, or issued cooperation around the idea of a sovereign individual which was received as a defect because a new line was drawn between the divine masculine and divine feminine. JP took the divine masculine side, and 'smart ass' took the divine feminine side. Except the divine feminine side was in an unevolved state using manipulation rather than actually being receptive to the divine masculine side. The 'I don't have to tell you' was not accepted as children have trouble accepting things.

The 'smart ass' was either consciously or unconsciously, betting that the majority of people don't understand the validity of the straw man logical fallacy.

The 'smart ass' isn't 'something'. The 'smart ass' is a tyrant. If JP was making a point, I think that was it.