We have DM and long-form content. Perhaps we should also consider creating a "Newsletter" service.

Everything can happen on top of Nostr. You could also consider paywalling it with Zapit or adopting a subscription for your newsletters.

It shouldn't be that difficult. It also seems very logical. Do you want something like this? ๐Ÿค”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Maybe we can get nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a to let people subscribe to her newsletter via nostr instead of email. Iโ€™d rather pay her in sats than cuckbucks!

Hmm. The Substack community may like or want this.

100%

this is going into Highlighter 2.1

I should probably write a public roadmap of where I'm taking Highlighter.

This is exciting ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Iโ€™d like to put a lot of my transcripts on here, but what would you recommend for binding my npub to it?

Fuck yes

zapit can do right now ? or cannot do recurring

We haven't built this yet, I was just pointing out, we have all the building block.

#[4], #[5] and many others economists cum bitcoiners / fintech persons have monthly newsletters is FIAT / CARD - they can look into using service n integrate with their portal (custom part may be)

Choose Life

๐Ÿ’Œ

Maybe nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft already made this. It's hard to keep up with his output.

Ok, what's a name of the service, do you have any link?

No it was kind of a joke, although I wouldn't be surprised if he had something in the works.

Beg pardon if I sound fractious, but isnโ€™t The Nostr Report filling this niche? Or do you mean something more newsy?

I was thinking of something, people outside nostr can also use ๐Ÿค”

Yes. I get you now.

Sounds good ๐Ÿ‘Œ

yeah, I have something like this in the works for Highlighter

Absolutely. A substack replacement/alternative would be fantastic

Unfollowed for mentioning "paywall" shit ๐Ÿคฎ

Either post or don't, stop pretending you can paywall text like some controlling faggot. If journalism isn't paid work anymore, tough shit

Paying for food you consume is good, but paying for content you consume is bad?

I hate paywalls as much as the next person. However, that doesn't mean they're bad and we should kill them with fire. It means that we must improve them to make them better.

I mean, this is exactly how I think about paywalls. I don't like them, but they are very efficient way to monetize, they can be also use for automating payment confirmation process.

It's gotta hurt your brain to force such bullshit through it, you know

I do have a problem with paywalls, in that I do not know what it is I am paying for. What if it is bad? That is why the paywall should direct on other stuff. Not for accessing content but other things. But internet has a tendency to be free, so it is difficult to monetize.

The main problem with "paywalls" is there are 3 reasonable choices for how to handle a "paywall"

1. Ignore the bullshit some idiot who likes "paywalls" wrote

2. Find it somewhere else hosted for free

3. Pay to copy it somewhere else so you can make sure the "paywall" fan isn't avoiding all public scrutiny

So they're not really paywalls, they're webpages that ask if you'd like to give money to an idiot and maybe be accused of thievery for posting screenshots lol

My vision would be that someone comes home from a job, has gained good sats, looks to his server and says: well I have a good job so I can pay my server maintainance costs and not worry. The users of those sites also have to work and also gain sats. If someome fails to run the server, someome else will step in and use his hard earned sets to give others the possibility to communicate via his server.

The real costs is earned by everyone in the real world, leaving the internet a free in freedom amd free in beer, space that you can visit.

Paying for content you consume is good

Asking this question in the context of "paywalls" shows you're retarded

Then again, that was already clear from your pandemic denial and dogecoin FUD

The matters that matters is the efficiency in which it can be shared.

If the nostr protocol has a significant edge in decentralization or efficiency in distributing, compared to websites, torrents, ftp or other possible methods of data transfers, it is worth it. Otherwise I wouldn't see the value of it that much...

There is definitely no better person than nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft to make this a reality.

Remember, we just have to get one product right. That product will become a catalyst for new adoption. It's all connected ๐Ÿคœ๐Ÿค›

This could be that product ๐Ÿค”

nostr:nevent1qqsfa9y2jy5l8nmv6x6wkf24tgq3m5ej2cmp0q8kvw0gmecsrxscwfspz4mhxue69uhkwun9v4h8xmm4dsh8xurpvdjsygxx7urh795e65x0j25k22l7hlavqh7xss4eacu3pzwetxu26h2gl5psgqqqqqqsafv9sr

This is ๐Ÿ’ฏ where Iโ€™m headed and it will be a reality shortly.

Its going to be aimed at newbies and Iโ€™ll optimize the onboarding flow very carefully

oh that would be really awesome! hopefully nostr:npub19mduaf5569jx9xz555jcx3v06mvktvtpu0zgk47n4lcpjsz43zzqhj6vzk will be the first โ€žclientโ€œ of this ๐Ÿ˜‰

we were discussing this a while back: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/797

I have plans to integrate something like this to zapthreads