Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

Here me out, the major toxic voting incentives can be fixed very easily:

If you receive a subsidy, welfare, handout from the govt of any kind, you automatically lose the right to vote. In no world does it make sense for people who receive benefit to get to vote for those who pay for it to have a greater, coerced obligation to them.
af
af511e75... 8mo ago đź’¬ 2

I propose that you can either be on social security benefits OR have a driver’s license. You get to choose and can switch once

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

b8
According To Me 8mo ago đź’¬ 1

I assume you mean the fake disability benefits rather than the retirement benefits we all pay into that we will never receive.

nostr:nevent1qqsfajj9vv8cfm0ywc4ysu2jkrex470lgcy5hklze6mkpp0jsjcm3gcpzemhxue69uhkvet9v3ejumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgq3q4ag3ua239v9lv6k3azyqgqjfcr66adn95d4983qylwa9wj52thyqxpqqqqqqzysk4jv

Avatar
Guy Swann 8mo ago đź’¬ 1

Not understanding what the relationship between those two things are that puts them at disincentives for each other… 🤔🤨

af
af511e75... 8mo ago đź’¬ 1

If you can work, you can drive. If you can’t work, you can’t drive. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Perfect way to get people to not try to game the system, and also a great way to get elderly drivers off the roads for everyone’s benefit.

Avatar
Guy Swann 8mo ago đź’¬ 1

That doesn't answer the question about how the incentives of these two things are interdependent.

af
af511e75... 7mo ago

Don’t know what to tell you, chief. It’s an unreasonable solution proposed by a dick jokes account.