That's fair. The approach is too puritanical to be practical, in my eyes, but I respect it.

In the UK election. I will not vote as it is pointless. In the US I would vote. It will very likely be easier to build a btc based parallel economy which we need under Kennedy or Trump as opposed to any version of Biden.

Votes are anonymous and as such whether you voted and how is only known to you. My vote does not mean I agree with anything, it is a gamble, a bet that one version of govt will be more helpful on the way to divorcing the state than another.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We disagree about the feasibility and likelihood of a presidential candidate facilitating a BTC economy. But that's fine.

If you stay home on election day, that's not anonymous. You couldn't have voted if you didn't show up. I'd rather send that message.

I am not saying any presidential candidate will help us build a BTC economy, only that some will obstruct it less.

Even that is subjective at best. The entire point of a governments entire existence hinges upon the validity of private property violations. Thus being it a NECESSITY in order for the thing to exist its a distortion on EVERY human beings economic choices. So to say that X politician is going to disturb less is like also saying that this poison will kill me less slowly so ill take that one instead of just stopping the ingestion of the poison altogether.

I wish that not voting would automatically take me out of the system. It does not.