Does this track with your guys' assessment of the footage? I haven't had time to watch closely. But I know a psyop is at play to gear up for war one one hand and surveillance on the other.

nostr:nevent1qqsy3lf8529zn5uld0ykcc5e8z2yryxfsdectxndeu8ptha9556s9qspzemhxue69uhkzem8wghxummnw3ezumrpdejz7q3qzede6daz3yp3qwhe45jqx67u2sns3qkqrtw4z4u3ljtxv9nultqsxpqqqqqqzs9eqgr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No.

Feds don’t need to provoke these fucks.

Also, most Feds are still on their side.

This is retarded. Police are letting people do things because that is what the politicians who run California openly want, not because the rioters are secret Federal agents.

Perhaps. But governments never let a good crisis go to waste. It's going to be used to keep people scared and distracted from an increase in control.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

No, I'm saying this because this is what governments fucking do.

In this example, what California’s government is fucking doing is pretending that nothing is happening, and telling us that the Federal government is bringing violence to peaceful protest.

Is that what appears to be happening?

That's what California and the media on one side are doing, yes. And the other side is trying to sneak in use of new surveillance tech, violating the 4th Amendment in new and perverse ways, while normalizing the idea of a national military presence in local areas.

It's all evil. It's all being used for control and shirking off responsibility and accountability to other people.

That is my conception of it anyway, but I'm also looking to get more info and more perspective. Thank you for your two sats.

Yea nostr:npub1zede6daz3yp3qwhe45jqx67u2sns3qkqrtw4z4u3ljtxv9nultqs0e3hvt is 💯 accurate on this one. The fact that ICE agents are covering their faces to conceal their identities, is something no legitimate officer should be doing unless they’re up to no good. There are definitely paid provocateurs in the mix aswell, stirring up chaos and violence to distort the narrative. The media spins this as propaganda, but the truth is that the protests are largely peaceful. The real violence comes from the police, who are shooting reporters with rubber bullets and injuring innocent people, including the elderly and children. It’s the police who instigate the violence, while the protesters are firmly against it.

I would imagine that some, maybe most, of the protestors are firmly against violence. This seems really messy though. I would be just as suspicious of them if I were you, and quick to concede, around other people who see the protests as violent, that looting and burning cars is violence and is not what you're referring to.

This is a messy situation and the nuance of it escapes statist normies. Don't let it escape you.

Fair enough. I think at this point Bitcoiner > libertarian or other political leanings idk.

With protests of this scale, with so many large actors behind the scenes it gets complicated real quick.

Looters and thieves take advantage of the chaos and paid agents instigate violence on people and property burning cars for video clicks on normie media.

Yet, who stands to benefit the most with these protests going the way they are?

I appreciate you taking interest in all this. Having a real talk about what is going on isn't what most people want to do. 🤙🏽💯