I don't believe there are any bad actors, I just think one side thinks filters are effective and the other side doesn't

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Maybe.

You believe they are not effective, right?

correct

That's so crazy to me. I don't understand the logic. If something can be routed around but still prevents what it was intended to any extent, it is effective to some degree.

Like most theives are opportunistic. Just closing the front door keeps them out. Even if they could go around back, most won't.

i prefer solutions that work

Okay.... If the door works 80% of the time, remove the door.

Whatever you say bud...

What is blinding you?

the filters don't work 80% of the time. it works 0% of the time

as far as I know, anyone who attempted to get around the filter has been able to do it successfully 100% of the time

the perception of it "working" is being mislabeled from the fact noone has done it much in the past because its a waste of money compared to 4x cheaper methods (inscriptions).

The externalities of the filters are worse than what they're trying to prevent

correct

At this point this sounds like:

Well Pfizer believed the shots were safe and effective although they killed many and then was evident they are not safe and effective, and then all the corruption was revealed and all the wrongdoings with hiding / ignoring test results, making scientific manipulations, authority oppression, censoring voices ...

But you know what, they are not a bad actor, they just believed it was safe and effective.