Maybe. I’m not at a place where I am willing to say, even conceptually, one religion or spiritual belief is inherently correct and the others are inherently wrong. Quantum is showing that unobserved elements can exist at a probabilistic state.

We make decisions, more often than not, based on probability distributions. And sometimes arg max probability is conflated with correctness or truth or accuracy. When in reality, sampling from a distribution is usually far more accurate.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Oh sure, I’m not, here, making a claim for any particular universal truth - just defending the idea of such a claim at all!

Yeah! I didn’t think you were :) but I think there is something to be said for the unknown. And I think there is a case to be made against even the existence of a universal truth in this. In either case, what someone believes spiritually, as there is no known, can’t be deemed as being more or less correct as what someone else believes. So in that sense… they are either all right or all wrong, as opposed to one being right and the rest being wrong.