nope, i am saying that there are situations when you have to choose between 1 death or 100k death, and which choice is more ethical and if you are promoting death in front of a large audience, there is a big chance that you are also causing death, and not only 1
for example: when hitler died would you said that it is very sad that this person died, he had a family, rest in peace hitler?
An equivalent case could be made for killing vocal pro-choice speakers because their speaking might cause the deaths of many pre-birth babies.
I don’t believe Charlie was pro death of innocents in any case.
Comparing him to hitler who was explicitly and absolutely pro death is false equivalence.
I think I understand what you’re trying to say though.
im glad i could explain it and yes i was just trying to find a radical example so it is more demonstrative, so yeah its difficult to find a grood example, but everybody knows hitler and kind of has similar opinions (most of the time)
