^ This message is dedicated to one of the biggest Bitcoin gatekeepers and institutionalists I know: nostr:npub1f40egu9fymsz0qmg9cyqgtl0u7vznxsyr3czse6x66jp3d9723uszajn7l nostr:npub137x48n3c7wzyaawmeydkwdxdkvg3gd2mvpp6phrjft9y5xrxqa9q9kz69c
Discussion
How are they gatekeeping?
Think about what a conference for thousands actually is: someone deciding who speaks, who doesn't, what messages get amplified, what Bitcoin "should" look like to attendees.
That's before we get to the secret meetings of "local Bitcoin leaders" planning the future of Czech Bitcoin community. Or threatening legal action against anyone who dares list their events without permission.
Its basically central planning with Bitcoin characteristics.
You are against the idea of a conference?
Otherwise sure, threatening with legal action is shitty, but without knowing any details I don't have any specific opinion about this case.
I'm not against conferences - I'm against conferences operating as top-down institutions that control narratives, curate speakers based on influence rather than substance, and function as businesses gatekeeping who gets heard instead of open spaces for builders to coordinate.
That's sort of bound to happen as soon as the conference is bigger than 100 people, so then the question is whether there are spaces during the conference where people can share, it's open to all, anyone can chat and make connections, etc.
At the big Bitcoin conference in the US this was the space in front of the Open Source stage - many random developers and folks.
I don't think it's about scale - even events for thousands can be done differently, as CCC and similar demonstrate. It's about approach and principles. We did UTXO.22 for 1.2k locals - gave space to anyone who wanted to speak with minimal curation, didn't sell any stupid commercial stands etc. It's just hard to imagine how these events can work because most conferences operate on classical top-down curated models.
Understood. Do you have links to the conferences you mentioned? I'm not familiar with either.
CCC (Chaos Communication Congress) https://events.ccc.de/en/congress/
UTXO.22 was czech local confererence: https://explore.prgblockweek.com/23/event/utxo
Cry harder
What is the story about you threatening with legal action?
Tree and few other shitcoiners were parasitizing on BTC Prague in a very sleaze way which damaged our speakers and we didn’t agree with. We asked politely to take it down. They didn’t listen until they got an official letter. Play stupid games, win stupid prices
Thank you for the reply here!
Not sure if it's a good idea at this point to dig more into this, but do you have any pointer or explanation with details about what they did?
Imho its not good idea. I have different advice for you. Stay constructive and focus on building rather then distractions as this one. 🫡
As I wrote, we just published their event without permission (as any other event). There were lots of events taking place in Prague that week, and we just compiled an overview.
They framed our neutral infrastructure (an event aggregator) as "parasitizing" and "damaging speakers" when we were just doing what event aggregators do - providing information about what's happening in the city. Classic example of institutionalists treating neutral tools as threats when they can't control the narrative.
These are people who did a great community conference for local people (Chaincamp), but then they discovered that bitcoin maximalism can be a really good business, and that they can make a lot of money from it. Just put "bitcoin-only" on it and people will go for it.
So they came to Prague, rented a hall in the fields on the outskirts of Prague, and started selling booths and doing business from the community on a large scale.
This fight against being associated with other blockchains is just theater - ideological branding to protect the business model.
There are no principles behind BTC Prague. It's institutional wet dream - heavily curated talks designed to maximize tribalization, which they then monetize. Commercial booths you pay thousands for, selling products to people who've been primed with ideological messaging.
I have been to many conferences (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Monero...), but I have not seen this level of commercialization anywhere else. Even the commercial ones usually have an open system where anyone can propose their talk and sponsors have some limited space, not that commercial booths fill most of the space.
I recommend visiting BTC Prague and then maybe some Ethereum event, I think you will clearly understand what I am talking about.