Also vaccines are not injected into the blood stream, side effects are assessed in randomized studies, and his note is an overconfident story of associations and rumors.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah this is very disappointing

I’m not sorry that I don’t simply believe what is normal because of what I’ve found over the years. But this sort of response, absent of an argument and simply saying “you’re disappointed” as if I am here to please you or reinforce what you think, will produce the opposite effect of what you think.

I took many years of exploring this topic before feeling I could make a comment on it. I rarely let myself make a claim of something on the cuff, and I don’t say random bullshit to be controversial. I also don’t hide what I think is true because I fear someone will be “disappointed.”

The simple truth is, the blanket statement from the medical industry is “vaccines are perfectly safe, there are no side effects, inject your child with all of them at the youngest age possible, this is health.” Is both flatly dishonest and comes with substantial risk. I have come to this conclusion because of many studies and comparisons I have seen, and more importantly, the absolute lack of hard, reliable data that the pharmaceutical comapnies can produce to *defend* their stance. Instead they defend with the inertia of the status quo.

Big Pharma is built on an industry of disease not cure. It’s wise to err on that side of questioning in my mind. I think we’ve seen only too well over the last 3 years how blind trust ends up.

Find me a long term clinical trial compared to a group without aluminum adjuvants. To the contrary of your claim, the NIAID was actually forced to go on record in court when challenged admitting that they have do not have any long term controlled trials that compare the side effects of vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Not to mention regulations explicitly allow them to get around performing them.

If you think you can produce something the NIAID couldn’t, I’m more than happy to check it out. It would be greatly appreciated.

My claim is that your note is overconfident and fails to assess causation.

Dude, the burden of proof for obscure side effects is on you.