Except that it works not as a universal score imposed by a government or corporate platform. Instead it’s a web of trust score from your perspective as a user. I think apps should by default include a moderation calculator for a user but also a service for new users. A kind of default they can change to use a different set of moderation decisions or none at all.

All platforms already have this scoring system, nostr does too, we just are using it at the relay and app level for spam. The point isn’t to have no-moderation, trust or safety on a protocol. The point is that users should have agency. If you control your identity and can use multiple apps, and can choose what moderation judgements you want, then that’s no censorship. That’s user empowerment.

Nostr has no singletons… no single directory, no registry, no point of control. Users own their identity and they can choose which clients they use and those can choose which relays they pull data from. This is the freedom we need.

Users should also be able to have private accounts, choose who can see their content, and what kind of rules they want to follow. Having functional opt-in moderation options is important. A web of trust score is an important way of achieving that end.

A system which is 4chan like without any ability to create personal safety will only appeal to a very small and privileged subset of internet users. It’s fine for something like that to exist, but Nostr can be so much more than that.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Private accounts are a little dicey. I’ve always thought it’s super creepy that a private account can see me but I can’t see them unless they allow it. It’s like giving somebody an invisibility cloak 🤣

I feel you 😂💜🫂 I’m definitely watching Harry Potter tonight.

What about instead of private accounts it’s just something that only enables people that follow you and who you follow to comment? (if you turn that on. Otherwise the default is open)

So you can see each other but you control who gets to comment on your posts? They can still talk rubbish about you most likely on their own feed, still free to be a plonker, but you don’t have to be notified about it?

Yes so I’ve thought about that too but that kind of comments-for-mutuals-only seems a little difficult to accomplish via nostr… maybe I’m wrong about that? I’ll have to think on it. But that was a big discussion on Twitter when Mute was introduced but people still preferred Block because then bad actors couldn’t even reply. That’s a little tougher on an open protocol.

Damn, this is hard 🙈 yeah, I wanted to keep it decentralised 🥹

I do have a second option, but you guys won’t like it.

We write some options down on prices of paper. Then we get someone’s cute puppy to pick one. Whichever one the puppy picks we go with, cos who in their right mind would get mad at a puppy? 🥹

How nips are actually are created.

🐶🐶🐶

There’s a github repo: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips

Here is the process:

Criteria for acceptance of NIPs

1. They should be implemented in at least two clients and one relay -- when applicable.

2. They should make sense.

3. They should be optional and backwards-compatible: care must be taken such that clients and relays that choose to not implement them do not stop working when interacting with the ones that choose to.

4. There should be no more than one way of doing the same thing.

5. Other rules will be made up when necessary.

You can see and participate in the discussions for proposed nip’s here: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pulls

The conversations tend to be pretty technical but there’s always a need for diverse kinds of inputs in the design process.

Putting a score is like that Black Mirror episode Nosedive, but i think worse, you’re essentially allowing people’s voice to be suppressed by any bad actors who have a lot of time and/or money to go after someone

Building a system that doesn’t have affordances for users being able to protect themselves is exactly that, suppressing people’s voices by any bad actors who have a lot of time and/or money to go after somebody.