> It's a shame that there is barely any uninhabited land not owned by an existing state left on Earth. Otherwise, people like you of any ethnicity could start states based on your principles without bothering others.

Then again, it would be hard to do that for ethnonationalism because you would have to portion up the land between each ethnicity.

In fact, I've always wondered: what about mixed-race people? Where do they go?

There's more than one semi/ non recognised pseudo state in existence right now. Unfortunately when the time is appropriate, the US will bomb and occupy them so that they can be enriched. Up until 20 years ago Iceland was pretty close to being an ethnostate. Ultimately a semi segregated multi ethnic society is about the best anyone can probably hope for going forward but I can't predict the future.

> I guess the reason it bothers me when people online blame the Jews is because no one I know does the things they are blamed for.

Does it bother you when people blame the boomers for the current financial predicament? Whites for the modern and/ or historical problems of minorities both in the west and the Global South? Did you know there is a very popular conspiracy theory that "Anglos" secretly run the entire world? If so do you think that conspiracy includes all Anglos, even according to the conspiracy theorists?

> Why does that sound like a threat?

Surely you must know that anything you or I say will federate to instances that don't respect deletes, right?

> But I don't have a precise definition.

See, there's the problem, NatSoc and ethnonationalism existed long before this term, which was invented by Richard Spencer to describe his group, that no longer exists. It's also important to note that I'm not trying to distance myself from Earl when I say we're not politically aligned. I expect he would agree that me not being NatSoc or within or near the general sphere of fascism means we are not politically aligned. There is little reason to group us together under an umbrella term that is difficult to define.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#[0]

>Does it bother you when people blame the boomers for the current financial predicament?

Currently no. But now that I come to think of it, it should. Thanks.

>Whites for the modern and/ or historical problems of minorities both in the west and the Global South?

Yes. In fact, IIRC the main reason I am on this side of fedi is because I get into fights with social injustice warriors who blame whites and think only racism against them is acceptable but not against minorities.

>Did you know there is a very popular conspiracy theory that "Anglos" secretly run the entire world?  If so do you think that conspiracy includes all Anglos, even according to the conspiracy theorists?

I always thought the "eternal Anglo" memes were a joke. Like the "Hibernian conspiracy" memes.

>Surely you must know that anything you or I say will federate to instances that don't respect deletes, right?

I'm not planning on deleting it.

I hope that everyone who sees it understands my position and doesn't think I'm "only calling myself white/Jewish when it's convenient".

Ah, you were saying *Earl* is a Nazi, not yourself. My bad.

> I always thought the "eternal Anglo" memes were a joke

They are. Doesn't stop people from creating "London Bankers run the world" and "Anglo American banking conspiracy".

QE2 runs (or ran now I guess) the world:

https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/17/exposed-all-the-queens-agents-and-corporations-that-control-the-world/

When you're not constrained by the truth you can basically say anything.

> Ah, you were saying *Earl* is a Nazi, not yourself. My bad.

Yes, but more importantly I'm saying I don't think either of us are alt right because I don't think it's a meaningful term to describe anyone who wasn't in Spencer's specific group.