Hypothetical for you nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s ...

Apple say you can keep note zaps in nostr:npub18m76awca3y37hkvuneavuw6pjj4525fw90necxmadrvjg0sdy6qsngq955, but you have to 30% split to their LN Address with a minimum of 10 sats per transaction to them.

Waddaya do?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I definitely would. Orange pilling apple would be huge.

Did you offer that to them?

They get to experiment with a new technology on a small scale.

Can somebody get ahold of Woz?!

This kind of decision is probably beyond the average appstore reviewer that I’ve been talking to.

Most certainly.

How do we get it run up the chain?

nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m?

Definitely worth a shot. I believe nostr:npub1zafcms4xya5ap9zr7xxr0jlrtrattwlesytn2s42030lzu0dwlzqpd26k5 has some contacts in Apple who have been weighing in on it as well.

I'm no Apple simp and 30% is egregious, but it's a free market and if people want to use Apple it's up to them.

Such a clear zap split might start to wake people up!

Did you eehhh... ask for the manager?

That's not what the nip says though.

Interesting.

Damus would have to route zaps I guess. 🤷

Or process sequentially (Apple first, then recipient once Apple have their pound of flesh) to keep it distributed.

The whole thing stinks tbh.

At best, they hijack the user and make them pay themselves and then split the funds between apple and themselves automatically (fortunately very easy with Bitcoin, unfortunately very slow and difficult with the fiat that Apple will ask for).

Maybe a good idea is to force a max amount such that they can do official accounting that shows every zap = $0.00 (rounded to the nearest penny) and therefore nothing is due?

cap zaps at 9 sats? 🤣

Orange pilling Apple aside, this feels worse than just deactivating zaps for iOS clients.

Does Apple take 30% of zaps from Android users? Desktop users? If not, is the receiver on an iOS device charged the 30%? or the payer from an iOS device?

Depends how you look at it.

The Apple tax is effectively on the receiver (they receive less), paid by the payer.

It's all horrible. 🤮

Cuck move.

If we get Apple to stack sats all hell breaks lose. It would be a Guerilla advertising campaign for the history books.

nostr:nevent1qqs2vx72l2rg9d0e3zmsgjer0nme58kdu8zp7dcxc79f0cumvhwtrfqpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurvv438xarj9e3k7mgzyrz0tea8t2xwx6pa22w07p3kssuu2209ys7xkyjm56rcjxvg2m9vwqcyqqqqqqg8x7qxl

All according to plan 😂 😈

First sneak in the whitepaper, then get them to stack. From the outside, to the Apple plebs, it looks like Apple tries to give hints, immediately the conspiracies would pop up.

5 years from now Apple sells Bitcoin nodes and miners, a 799$ and 19.999$ for Raspi and s9 equivalents of course but nevertheless.

We already have umbrel for the 799 price point 😆

1299 base + 200 for hdd upgrade and +200 for memory 😂

Wow. Look how naive I am.

OK, 5000$ full node, +1500$ LN upgrade, +500$ customer support and custodial holding service

Custodial service add on for an extra monthly fee 😂

Or you can have it all in a VPS, no costly hardware. Just 0.99$ per block verification!

N'importe quoi, j'espère juste que vous avez fait un compte-rendu ou recapulatifs ecrits des premières interactions d'avec Apple et toutes les propositions que vous aviez émises in fine rejetées

If Apple allows zaps, would that mean twitter would enable twitter monkeys to fling dog-e sh!t at eachother?